Revitalizing Education for the Women’s Movement:
A brief note
Jasodhara Bagchi
‘Fili, Sapientia thesaurus est et cor tuum archa’
(Child, knowledge is a treasure and your heart is its strongbox.)
Hildegaard of Binjen. 12th Century
I. Education per se has not been central to women’s
movement as we understand it today. Rather, we tend to say Education
for Women’s Equality (NPE 1986/92) or Education for Women’s Empowerment
(Mahila Samakhya). Why does it need these special accreditations in
order to be acceptable to women’s movement? The answer is that
Education obviously contains within it, the potential for inequality
and disempowerment that needs to be addressed specially. An uneasy
relation, therefore, exists between the question of gender inequality
and the mainstream education.
As I had argued elsewhere, that the process of what Simone de Beauvoir
called ‘becoming woman’ is inexorably, a political one, embedded as it
is, in the power imbalance within social organizations that witness the
process of social reproduction. Along with inherited belief systems and
media practices, educational processes are largely responsible for
shaping our personalities and socializing us into members of particular
class, caste, ethnicity and religious community to which we belong.
Since patriarchy is ubiquitous and cuts across all forms of domination,
education, left to itself, could act as the most prominent reinforcing
agent to lead women into a position of subjection.
What has been called in liberal parlance, the ‘subjection of women’,
is, therefore, not just a social pathology that can be extracted like a
rotten tooth. Subtle processes of hegemonic consensus-building has been
put in place by what Althusser called the ideological state apparatus.
If we recall Althusser’s moment of intervention in history, education
was detected as one of the most significant of such apparatuses.
In a book entitled Pliable Pupils and Sufficient Self-Directors.
Narratives of Female Education by Five British Women Writers 1778-1814
just published, Barnita Bagchi has convincingly argued, there is a
strong ambiguity built into the concept of education, particularly in
the context of female education, which is of prime significance for the
question of ‘gender.’ ‘-Choosing the case of middle class British women
of the eighteenth century, Barnita diagnoses, education as a ‘site of
irreducible tension-- tension between a view of education as, on the
one hand, a form of social control, a way of guiding and indoctrinating
the pupil into gendered social norms and acceptable model of education,
with the stress on opening up opportunities and freedom, impelling the
pupil towards a more open ended model of development. (p.6)
As Barnita neatly summarizes the ambivalence,
The tension in the notion of education that I have been describing are
found in the very etymology of the word education—the emphasis on
‘ducere’ or leading on the one hand, and on ‘ex’, or the movement
towards freedom on the other. This is the dialectic between control and
freedom. (p.7.)
This basic ambivalence makes Education a particularly efficacious
instrument to wield in the women’s movement which articulates itself
with the help of constraints of gender construction Juxtaposing
education and women’s movement will bring out the dynamics within both.
What I propose to do is to unpack some of these and to see in what ways
revitalizing education might up help us to locate the patriarchical
foci within the ambience of society.
II. Education, as it has operated in a stratified
society like ours, has, we have got to remember, been a re-enforcing
agent of privilege, per se, this would mean that not only gender, it
has been one of the parameters of class and caste privileges. In a
state like West Bengal, moreover, where the Partition saw the exodus of
the Muslim middle classes, by and large, the spread of mainstream
education has also entrenched the divide between the dominant and the
minority religious communities. The vulgarity of the educational
aspirations of the native people during the colonial period was
epitomized by the Bengali couplet which roughly translated itself as
follows:
The one who learns
To read and write
Will ride in horses
Coaches bright.
Seen by the male elite of the early colonial times as the gateway to
jobs and opportunities opened up by the colonial masters, women,
shudras and other marginal groups were carefully excluded from the
process. The emerging Bhadramahila or the women members of the middle
classes have been characterized by the noted historian from Bangladesh
Ghulam Murshid as The Reluctant Debutante. The reluctance among the
debutantes, that is to say, the women who were expected to come out
through the process of so called ‘modernisation,’ of which education
was a central kingpin, is by no means something we can assume. But as
we hear, not only from male reformers like Iswarchandra Vidyasagar or
Jyotiba Phule but from Rokeya Sakhawat Hossein or Jyotirmoyee Devi how
the resentment against this exclusion got built up. Here is Jyotirmoyee:
Men get frightened when they hear of women’s education—in case the
oppressed understand the nature of their oppression and rebel against
it. So, it is said through different ploys that western education is
corrupting the blessed ideals of sacred India. Fortunately women have
not been corrupted by this education, so the skeleton of the Hindu
order (skeleton indeed!) till remains. So, please do not introduce
indiscipline in the purity of the inner quarters. (The irony is not to
be missed!)
I had occasion to examine the early phases of women’s writings when in
1863 the Journal Bamabodhini Patrika began to publish ‘women’s
compositions’ (bama rachana), women’s education was found to be as the
most palpable of instruments, not of women’s equality, but of a
civilized society, that can stand up to the missionaries who had used
education as the main plank of their critique. In other words, there is
always a possibility of a re-inscription of the patriarchal structure
around the family, community and kinship within this recasting of women
through new education.
It is, however, possible to simplify and thereby essentialize the
patriarchal takeover of the new education. In his Catechism on the
theme of widow immolation Raja Rammohan Roy had asked the universalist
question as to how the society could presume to vouch for women’s
deficiency in understanding, when no one had bothered to test it. Less
than two decades ago the English woman Mary Wolstonecraft had taken on
the male guru of the French Revolution, Jean Jacques Rousseau with
regard to his formulation of the education for the democratic era.
Rousseau had only addressed the question of education of the male in
Emile and had blithely relegated the girl Sophie to a blissful world of
ignorance so that she can please Emile the better. How is one to judge
the potential of Sophie if she were kept out of the purview of
education forever? What will be wrong, as I had indicated at the
beginning, is to ignore the emancipatory signal of the demand for
women’s education in the social Reform period that were taken up by the
women writers of the slightly later period with great sense of
commitment. As Tanika Sarkar’s superb edition of the first women’s
autobiography in Bengal, Amar Jiban by Rashasundari Devi brings out,
learning to read and write was like winning a battle: she became not
just sakshara but jitakshara. Hence this unique text was renamed by
Tanika as Words to Win.
III. In an oft-quoted article Partha Chatterjee
claimed that the Nationalist Resolution of the Women’s Question
signified that much of the liberating agenda for women of the Social
Reform period had got subsumed under the Resolution that had
re-invented the purity of the inner sphere, whose greater spirituality
kept the women as the gateway to the social order. Given the ambiguity
we have noted above, the claim is difficult to sustain except in the
form of a pure revivalist ideology. For one thing that women had made
strong inroads into the public sphere through the channel of education.
Kadambini Ganguly was the first woman medical practitioner to qualify
in the British Empire. As editors of a long-standing and highly reputed
periodical Bharati, Rabindranath Tagore’s elder sister Swarna Kumari
Devi and her two distinguished daughters Hironmoyee Devi and Sarala
Devi Choudhurani certainly made palpable efforts to make this
periodical into a platform for educating public opinion. If creative
writing by women could be misconstrued as belonging to the private
sphere, discursive uniting and organizing could hardly be considered as
excluded from the public sphere.
The Hindu exclusivity that marked the Cultural Nationalism was also
something that found no place in women’s own advocacy of education. The
brightest example is that of Rokeya Sakhawat Hosein who had written in
English Sultanas Dream a female utopia She had not only founded the
women’s organization called Anjuman e-khawalin but she did not rest
contented till she had founded a girls’ school in memory of her late
husband. When the first All India Women’s organization was founded in
1927 the All India Women’s Conference used education for women as one
of their major political platforms.
How did education lose this political edge in the years of turmoil just
before and after the Independence? This was partly due to the fact
that, in blindly focusing on unequal access to education, not enough
attention was paid to organization and content of education. While
individual scholars of sensitivity used their specialized knowledge of
education to critique the content and even the mode of delivery,
women's movement had not been sufficiently alerted to the complicity of
the entire educational process with the class-caste-ethnicity and
religious communitarianism that constantly thwarts the democratic
texture of our society. As the Indian women's movement has noted,
though not adequately, gender-marginalization has nestled in the bosom
of the larger inequities that threatens the entire educational process
That education had become a major grid in perpetuating gender gap in
society had remained largely invisible. Not only was the man-woman gap
wider as we went up the scale in prestigious slots in Higher Education,
such as Science and Technology the ever widening gap even as we moved
from Primary to Secondary level was seen as a source of a major worry.
Gendered understanding of education, however, cannot stop merely with
enumerating the gap in enrolment between boys and girls and the
inability of girl children to be retained in school. What came under
direct scrutiny of feminist scholars was the ways in which not just the
external modalities of the administering of education but the subtle
perpetuation of gender bias and other inequalities within the
mainstream education itself.
To unravel the exact nature of the process of perpetuation requires
time space and expertise that is not available to me. It has to take
into account, among other things, all the innovative work done by
committed NGOs and government officials, along with the policy measures
adopted at different levels of the state machinery. While the policies
have addressed the number game of literacy, retention and drop-outs,
the interventionist groups have addressed the serious lapses in making
educational opportunities not only accessible, but acceptable and
palatable for girls belonging to the deprived sections of our society.
Apart from larger movements like the Adult Education movement in the
sixties and seventies and the total literacy campaigns of the eighties,
Mahila Samakhya programme that started at the end of the eighties
certainly brought the empowerment of the toiling women from the
grassroots centrestage. Inspired by the Women’s Development Programme
in Rajasthan Mahila Samakhya had initiated the educational perspective
not as a one shot venture but as a process in which women learn to
collectives (Sanghas) to articulate their demands and priorities in
terms of their lived reality, to get rid of the sectoral divides in
order to converge the different priority areas, such as health, access
to credit and legal rights and so on. The official Mahila Samakhya
states, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka have made progress by leaps and
bound. But, what is to be noted is the energy that has been inducted in
the Hindi heartlands of U.P. and Bihar are to be ascribed to the
efforts of Mahila Samakhya combined with dynamic educational input like
the DPEP that used as inputs innovative thinking about addressing
women’s self-awareness in dealing with their own everyday-everynight
world. The way of ‘knowing’ is also effectively interrogated by this
innovative process of making education a programme of contributing
effectively towards making women critically aware of their
surroundings. This is the kind of education that is likely to bring
gender closer to addressing the social gaps produced by caste class and
ethnicity. Targeting human capability this innovative critical input
should be allowed to galvanize the elementary education, the right to
which is made into a fundamental right after the 84th Amendment.
A major opportunity opened up in Higher Education in the emergence of
Women’s Studies that permitted questioning the basic assumptions of
knowing. This has not only been facilitated by the questioning of
disciplinary boundaries but it has actively contributed to the
inter-disciplinarily of knowledge. At the same time, women’s
marginalisation and women's active agency have both energized analyses
made under the Women’s Studies/ Gender Studies. This rare combination
of criticality of analytical tools and commitment of activism have had
rich and extensive fall-outs. For instance, this demand for unpacking
not just the gender bias in the content of education, but the
recovering of ways in which the contents have been complicit with
majoritarian Brahmanical patriarchy, has been one of the rich outcomes
of Women's Studies.
I would like end on the cautionary note that is part o my unmistakable
bond with the scholar-activist whom we are honouring. Capitalism
under globalization has nakedly shed its earlier façade of
universalism. In India as in the rest of the world, majoritarian
fundamentalism has found a soul mate in market fundamentalism and the
two together are threatening education from both inside and outside.
With the global pressure on the state to withdraw from looking after
the basic needs of a democratising society such as elementary
education, health etc poor people's lives are being thrown open to the
unbridled profiteering of the market. At the same time, by elaborately
revising syllabi it is trying to replace history with myth and the
representation of women that goes with it. The recent move to rename
the U.G.C. centres of Women's Studies as Women and Family Studies is
meant to put criticality to sleep.
These simultaneous threats to education and to women’s movement finally
should alert us to the need to keep up the need for revitalizing
education on our own terms. Writing in honour of Gabrielle Dietrich is
a commitment to social justice and a pledge to make true democracy
prevail. This brief note is an inadequate ex-pression of the commitment